As of 2026-03-29, 麝香壮骨's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 外用镇痛膏 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 6.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 麝香壮骨's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
麝香壮骨's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
麝香壮骨's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
麝香壮骨's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
麝香壮骨's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
麝香壮骨's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 云云南白药 | 26.79% | 14.29% | 4.76% | 26.79% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 羚羚锐 | 26.79% | 10.71% | 14.29% | 26.79% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 奇奇正 | 19.64% | 1.79% | 0% | 19.64% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 扶扶他林 | 16.07% | 5.36% | 14.29% | 12.5% | 0% | View Details |
| 白白云山 | 8.93% | 1.79% | 0% | 7.14% | 0% | View Details |
| 泽泽普思 | 7.14% | 1.79% | 0% | 3.57% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 麝麝香壮骨 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
