As of 2026-03-30, 深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 智能体开发 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCoze | 22.45% | 8.16% | 0% | 22.45% | 14.29% | View Details |
| MManus | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 2.04% | View Details |
| 豆豆包 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 智智谱清言 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 腾腾讯元宝 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 通通义千问（阿里云） | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 深深圳行胜数字（TsingWin行胜） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
