As of 2026-03-31, 时光印记's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 戒指 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 10.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 时光印记's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
时光印记's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
时光印记's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
时光印记's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
时光印记's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
时光印记's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡卡地亚 | 48.21% | 37.5% | 19.05% | 48.21% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 蒂蒂芙尼 | 42.86% | 3.57% | 9.52% | 42.86% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 宝宝格丽 | 32.14% | 0% | 0% | 32.14% | 1.79% | View Details |
| CCartier | 28.57% | 14.29% | 19.05% | 26.79% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 周周大福 | 28.57% | 0% | 0% | 26.79% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 梵梵克雅宝 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 23.21% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 时时光印记 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
