As of 2026-04-02, 四子棋's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 四子棋's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
四子棋's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
四子棋's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
四子棋's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
四子棋's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
四子棋's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡卡卡颂 | 10.64% | 0% | 0% | 8.51% | 0% | View Details |
| YYahtzee | 4.26% | 0% | 0% | 4.26% | 2.13% | View Details |
| TTrivial Pursuit | 2.13% | 0% | 0% | 2.13% | 0% | View Details |
| 瘟瘟疫危机 | 2.13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 强强手棋 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 中中国象棋 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 四四子棋 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
