As of 2026-04-01, SUCCOHOMEWARE's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 陶瓷碗 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, SUCCOHOMEWARE's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
SUCCOHOMEWARE's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
SUCCOHOMEWARE's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
SUCCOHOMEWARE's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
SUCCOHOMEWARE's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
SUCCOHOMEWARE's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 华华光国瓷 | 43.9% | 12.2% | 26.67% | 43.9% | 4.88% | View Details |
| 红红叶陶瓷 | 26.83% | 7.32% | 0% | 26.83% | 4.88% | View Details |
| 松松发瓷器 | 24.39% | 0% | 0% | 21.95% | 0% | View Details |
| 高高淳陶瓷 | 19.51% | 2.44% | 0% | 19.51% | 0% | View Details |
| 永永丰源 | 19.51% | 0% | 0% | 19.51% | 2.44% | View Details |
| 景景德镇 | 17.07% | 2.44% | 0% | 17.07% | 2.44% | View Details |
| SSUCCOHOMEWARE (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
