As of 2026-03-31, 胎压监测仪's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 汽车电器 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 胎压监测仪's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
胎压监测仪's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
胎压监测仪's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
胎压监测仪's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
胎压监测仪's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
胎压监测仪's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 博博世 | 64.29% | 50% | 33.33% | 62.5% | 12.5% | View Details |
| BBose | 17.86% | 3.57% | 9.52% | 14.29% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 770迈 | 10.71% | 1.79% | 0% | 8.93% | 0% | View Details |
| 盯盯盯拍 | 10.71% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 0% | View Details |
| 霍霍尼韦尔 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| 柏柏林之声 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 胎胎压监测仪 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
