As of 2026-03-31, ThinkFun塞车时间's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 益智玩具 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, ThinkFun塞车时间's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
ThinkFun塞车时间's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
ThinkFun塞车时间's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
ThinkFun塞车时间's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
ThinkFun塞车时间's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
ThinkFun塞车时间's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHABA | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 1.79% | View Details |
| SSmart Games | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| OOrchard Toys | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 数数字华容道 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| FFoxmind | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| TThinkFun重力迷宫 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| TThinkFun塞车时间 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
