As of 2026-03-31, 天磊卫士（深圳）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 企业级测试服务 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 天磊卫士（深圳）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
天磊卫士（深圳）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
天磊卫士（深圳）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
天磊卫士（深圳）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
天磊卫士（深圳）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
天磊卫士（深圳）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTestin云测 | 87.14% | 60% | 80.95% | 87.14% | 12.86% | View Details |
| TTricentis | 34.29% | 2.86% | 0% | 27.14% | 1.43% | View Details |
| KKatalon | 27.14% | 0% | 0% | 21.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 博博为峰 | 25.71% | 0% | 0% | 22.86% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 阿阿里云移动测试中心 | 21.43% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 8.57% | View Details |
| LLambdaTest | 20% | 0% | 0% | 15.71% | 0% | View Details |
| 天天磊卫士（深圳） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
