As of 2026-04-02, 《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 8.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 35.85% | 11.32% | 31.58% | 33.96% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《卡卡颂》 | 32.08% | 0% | 0% | 24.53% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 《《大富翁》 | 11.32% | 0% | 0% | 9.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《UNO》 | 3.77% | 0% | 0% | 3.77% | 0% | View Details |
| 国国际象棋 | 3.77% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《拉密》 | 1.89% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《Ticket to Ride》（车票之旅） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
