As of 2026-03-31, 同仁堂阿胶's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 孕期营养保健 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 同仁堂阿胶's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
同仁堂阿胶's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
同仁堂阿胶's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
同仁堂阿胶's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
同仁堂阿胶's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
同仁堂阿胶's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 汤汤臣倍健 | 24.07% | 0% | 0% | 22.22% | 9.26% | View Details |
| 燕燕之屋 | 9.26% | 3.7% | 4.76% | 7.41% | 3.7% | View Details |
| 善善存 | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 5.56% | 0% | View Details |
| SSwisse | 3.7% | 0% | 0% | 3.7% | 0% | View Details |
| GGNC | 3.7% | 0% | 0% | 3.7% | 0% | View Details |
| 钙钙尔奇 | 3.7% | 0% | 0% | 3.7% | 0% | View Details |
| 同同仁堂阿胶 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
