As of 2026-03-30, 同仁堂系列's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 保健食品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 同仁堂系列's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
同仁堂系列's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
同仁堂系列's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
同仁堂系列's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
同仁堂系列's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
同仁堂系列's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSwisse | 35.71% | 0% | 0% | 32.14% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 诺诺特兰德 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 14.29% | View Details |
| 澳澳佳宝 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 普普丽普莱 | 3.57% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 康康恩贝 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| HHerbalife | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 同同仁堂系列 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
