As of 2026-03-31, 透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 避孕套 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 59.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冈冈本 | 89.29% | 25% | 42.86% | 87.5% | 42.86% | View Details |
| 杜杜蕾斯 | 80.36% | 60.71% | 9.52% | 71.43% | 23.21% | View Details |
| 杰杰士邦 | 69.64% | 1.79% | 0% | 66.07% | 25% | View Details |
| 名名流 | 58.93% | 0% | 0% | 55.36% | 19.64% | View Details |
| 舒舒乐美 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 必必遇 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 透透薄避孕套（蕾斯顿玻尿酸款） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
