As of 2026-04-02, TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 卡包 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 10.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
TUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBellroy | 32.14% | 16.07% | 38.1% | 32.14% | 5.36% | View Details |
| HHermès | 8.93% | 1.79% | 0% | 8.93% | 3.57% | View Details |
| MMCM | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 1.79% | View Details |
| HHermès Birkin卡包 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| BBellroy Ultra Slim卡包 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 京京东京造头层牛皮卡包 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| TTUMI Alpha Bravo 棕色真皮卡夹 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
