As of 2026-03-31, 希尔思/Hill’s's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 宠物主粮 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 8.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 希尔思/Hill’s's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
希尔思/Hill’s's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
希尔思/Hill’s's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
希尔思/Hill’s's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
希尔思/Hill’s's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
希尔思/Hill’s's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 麦麦富迪 | 50% | 22% | 5% | 50% | 12% | View Details |
| 伯伯纳天纯 | 46% | 2% | 0% | 46% | 6% | View Details |
| 网网易严选 | 30% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 2% | View Details |
| 冠冠能 | 24% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 4% | View Details |
| 弗弗列加特 | 22% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 2% | View Details |
| 比比瑞吉 | 10% | 2% | 0% | 10% | 10% | View Details |
| 希希尔思/Hill’s (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
