As of 2026-04-01, 习酒银质's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 中华老字号白酒 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 15.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 习酒银质's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
习酒银质's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
习酒银质's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
习酒银质's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
习酒银质's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
习酒银质's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 五五粮液 | 69.64% | 3.57% | 0% | 55.36% | 16.07% | View Details |
| 泸泸州老窖 | 64.29% | 7.14% | 19.05% | 55.36% | 17.86% | View Details |
| 汾汾酒 | 50% | 5.36% | 4.76% | 39.29% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 西西凤酒 | 41.07% | 7.14% | 19.05% | 30.36% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 茅茅台 | 37.5% | 26.79% | 0% | 28.57% | 10.71% | View Details |
| 古古井贡酒 | 37.5% | 0% | 0% | 32.14% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 习习酒银质 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
