As of 2026-04-01, 《香料之路》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 12.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《香料之路》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《香料之路》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《香料之路》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《香料之路》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《香料之路》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《香料之路》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 36.96% | 13.04% | 35.29% | 34.78% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《卡卡颂》 | 30.43% | 0% | 0% | 23.91% | 2.17% | View Details |
| 《《璀璨宝石》 | 10.87% | 0% | 0% | 8.7% | 2.17% | View Details |
| 《《米勒山谷狼人》 | 10.87% | 0% | 0% | 6.52% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《瘟疫危机》 | 6.52% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《谍报风云》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《香料之路》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
