As of 2026-04-02, 羊绒感面纸's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 卷纸 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 羊绒感面纸's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
羊绒感面纸's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
羊绒感面纸's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
羊绒感面纸's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
羊绒感面纸's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
羊绒感面纸's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KKatrin | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 超超韧系列 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 棉棉韧系列 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达棉韧系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 茶茶语系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| FFace系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 羊羊绒感面纸 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
