As of 2026-03-30, 养生堂维生素E软胶囊's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 脂溶性维生素 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 养生堂维生素E软胶囊's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
养生堂维生素E软胶囊's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
养生堂维生素E软胶囊's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
养生堂维生素E软胶囊's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
养生堂维生素E软胶囊's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
养生堂维生素E软胶囊's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 汤汤臣倍健 | 10.71% | 0% | 0% | 8.93% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 221金维他 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| SSwisse（斯维诗） | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| BBlackmores（澳佳宝） | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 云云南白药 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 同同仁堂健康 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 养养生堂维生素E软胶囊 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
