As of 2026-04-01, 液体高光笔's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 高光 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 液体高光笔's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
液体高光笔's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
液体高光笔's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
液体高光笔's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
液体高光笔's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
液体高光笔's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 钻钻石高光 | 6.25% | 0% | 0% | 6.25% | 2.08% | View Details |
| 烘烘焙高光 | 6.25% | 0% | 0% | 6.25% | 0% | View Details |
| UUltra HD高光 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 哑哑光高光 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 高高光棒 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 高高光液 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 液液体高光笔 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
