As of 2026-03-31, 银杏时光碗's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 陶瓷碗 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 10.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 银杏时光碗's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
银杏时光碗's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
银杏时光碗's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
银杏时光碗's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
银杏时光碗's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
银杏时光碗's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 红红叶 | 29.27% | 9.76% | 12.5% | 29.27% | 7.32% | View Details |
| 浩浩雅 | 4.88% | 0% | 0% | 4.88% | 0% | View Details |
| 四四通 | 4.88% | 0% | 0% | 4.88% | 0% | View Details |
| 京京东京造 | 2.44% | 0% | 0% | 2.44% | 2.44% | View Details |
| 京京东京造纯白骨瓷碗 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 浩浩雅景德镇釉下彩陶瓷餐具 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 银银杏时光碗 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
