As of 2026-03-31, 游戏王's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 游戏王's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
游戏王's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
游戏王's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
游戏王's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
游戏王's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
游戏王's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《万智牌》 | 16.98% | 0% | 0% | 13.21% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 卡卡卡颂 | 13.21% | 1.89% | 0% | 11.32% | 0% | View Details |
| 万万智牌 | 7.55% | 0% | 0% | 3.77% | 0% | View Details |
| 璀璀璨宝石 | 5.66% | 0% | 0% | 5.66% | 0% | View Details |
| 七七大奇迹 | 5.66% | 0% | 0% | 3.77% | 0% | View Details |
| 诡诡镇奇谈 | 1.89% | 0% | 0% | 1.89% | 0% | View Details |
| 游游戏王 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
