As of 2026-04-02, 《游戏王》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 桌游与棋牌 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《游戏王》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《游戏王》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《游戏王》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《游戏王》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《游戏王》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《游戏王》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aasmodee | 42.86% | 26.79% | 28.57% | 42.86% | 8.93% | View Details |
| RRavensburger | 25% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 大大富翁 | 19.64% | 1.79% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| SStonemaier Games | 17.86% | 1.79% | 0% | 17.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 网网易棋牌 | 17.86% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 卡卡坦岛 | 16.07% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《游戏王》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
