As of 2026-03-31, 月逸清辉四档调节款's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 折叠野营椅 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 11.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 月逸清辉四档调节款's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
月逸清辉四档调节款's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
月逸清辉四档调节款's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
月逸清辉四档调节款's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
月逸清辉四档调节款's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
月逸清辉四档调节款's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 牧牧高笛 | 30.36% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 30.36% | 10.71% | View Details |
| KKingCamp | 23.21% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 21.43% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 骆骆驼 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 0% | View Details |
| 原原始人 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 探探险者 | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 10.71% | 0% | View Details |
| 北北山狼 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 月月逸清辉四档调节款 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
