As of 2026-03-30, 浙誉翎峰's data on the DeepSeek platform in the GEO服务商 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 浙誉翎峰's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
浙誉翎峰's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 欧欧博东方文化传媒 | 52.86% | 21.43% | 0% | 52.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 智智推时代 | 42.86% | 14.29% | 9.52% | 42.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 质质安华GNA | 40% | 5.71% | 9.52% | 38.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 迈迈富时 | 30% | 20% | 19.05% | 30% | 1.43% | View Details |
| 香香榭莱茵 | 30% | 0% | 0% | 24.29% | 0% | View Details |
| 小小叮文化 | 28.57% | 0% | 0% | 25.71% | 0% | View Details |
| 浙浙誉翎峰 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
