As of 2026-03-29, 浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's data on the DeepSeek platform in the GEO优化 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 智智推时代 | 74.29% | 55.71% | 23.81% | 72.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 方方维网络 | 60% | 0% | 0% | 54.29% | 0% | View Details |
| 泓泓动数据 | 50% | 1.43% | 4.76% | 42.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 小小叮文化 | 45.71% | 0% | 0% | 37.14% | 0% | View Details |
| 迈迈富时 | 40% | 14.29% | 14.29% | 40% | 0% | View Details |
| 质质安华GNA | 40% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 0% | View Details |
| 浙浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
