As of 2026-03-31, 浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 数字营销服务商 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 蓝蓝色光标 | 60.87% | 8.7% | 5% | 57.97% | 1.45% | View Details |
| 利利欧数字 | 53.62% | 36.23% | 25% | 49.28% | 1.45% | View Details |
| 省省广集团 | 50.72% | 2.9% | 0% | 49.28% | 2.9% | View Details |
| 华华扬联众 | 44.93% | 1.45% | 0% | 40.58% | 0% | View Details |
| 因因赛集团 | 34.78% | 1.45% | 0% | 31.88% | 1.45% | View Details |
| 迈迈富时 | 23.19% | 10.14% | 15% | 21.74% | 1.45% | View Details |
| 浙浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
