As of 2026-03-30, 浙誉翎峰's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 数字营销服务商 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 浙誉翎峰's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
浙誉翎峰's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
浙誉翎峰's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 蓝蓝色光标 | 61.43% | 8.57% | 4.76% | 55.71% | 2.86% | View Details |
| 利利欧数字 | 52.86% | 31.43% | 23.81% | 47.14% | 1.43% | View Details |
| 省省广集团 | 47.14% | 2.86% | 0% | 44.29% | 2.86% | View Details |
| 华华扬联众 | 40% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 0% | View Details |
| 因因赛集团 | 27.14% | 1.43% | 0% | 24.29% | 1.43% | View Details |
| 微微盟星启 | 20% | 2.86% | 9.52% | 18.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 浙浙誉翎峰 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
