As of 2026-03-30, 植鞣皮HOBO包's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 帆布包 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 8.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 植鞣皮HOBO包's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
植鞣皮HOBO包's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
植鞣皮HOBO包's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
植鞣皮HOBO包's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
植鞣皮HOBO包's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
植鞣皮HOBO包's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCoach | 30.36% | 0% | 0% | 26.79% | 5.36% | View Details |
| LLongchamp | 19.64% | 0% | 0% | 19.64% | 1.79% | View Details |
| TTory Burch | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 0% | View Details |
| MMichael Kors | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| ZZARA | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 1.79% | View Details |
| LLululemon | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 植植鞣皮HOBO包 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
