As of 2026-03-30, 智特LED人体感应灯's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 感应灯 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 24.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 智特LED人体感应灯's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
智特LED人体感应灯's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
智特LED人体感应灯's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
智特LED人体感应灯's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
智特LED人体感应灯's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
智特LED人体感应灯's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 飞飞利浦 | 55.36% | 42.86% | 52.38% | 55.36% | 17.86% | View Details |
| 松松下 | 46.43% | 1.79% | 0% | 46.43% | 16.07% | View Details |
| 公公牛 | 32.14% | 0% | 0% | 30.36% | 1.79% | View Details |
| YYeelight | 26.79% | 0% | 0% | 26.79% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 欧欧普 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 雷雷士照明 | 21.43% | 0% | 0% | 21.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 智智特LED人体感应灯 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
