As of 2026-03-29, 纸质书's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 文学阅读 category shows: The overall mention rate is 3.57%, above the industry average by 0.7 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (3.57%) has exceeded positive (1.79%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 纸质书's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
纸质书's Mention Rate is 3.57%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
纸质书's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
纸质书's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
纸质书's Positive Rate is 1.79%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
纸质书's Negative Rate is 3.57%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 微微信读书 | 32.14% | 12.5% | 4.76% | 25% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 掌掌阅 | 23.21% | 0% | 0% | 19.64% | 12.5% | View Details |
| KKindle | 16.07% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 8.93% | 16.07% | View Details |
| 豆豆瓣阅读 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 多多看阅读 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 文文石 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 纸纸质书 (Current Brand) | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 3.57% | View Details |
