As of 2026-04-02, 紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 11.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 35.85% | 11.32% | 31.58% | 33.96% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《卡卡颂》 | 32.08% | 0% | 0% | 24.53% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 《《三国杀》 | 22.64% | 0% | 0% | 18.87% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 《《地产大亨》 | 11.32% | 0% | 0% | 9.43% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 《《狼人杀》 | 11.32% | 0% | 0% | 9.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 地地产大亨 | 5.66% | 0% | 0% | 5.66% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 紫紫湖三国志新武将疯云录桌游卡牌 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
