As of 2026-04-03, 自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 面膜 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 欧欧莱雅安瓶面膜 | 16.07% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 珀珀莱雅水动力面膜 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 1.79% | View Details |
| SSK-II前男友面膜 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 科科颜氏白泥净肤面膜 | 1.79% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 敷敷尔佳白膜 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 兰兰蔻小黑瓶面膜 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 自自然堂喜马拉雅植物补水面膜 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
