As of 2026-03-30, 钻石护理's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 宠物主粮 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 7.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 钻石护理's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
钻石护理's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
钻石护理's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
钻石护理's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
钻石护理's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
钻石护理's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 皇皇家 | 67.86% | 33.93% | 33.33% | 64.29% | 16.07% | View Details |
| 麦麦富迪 | 53.57% | 26.79% | 4.76% | 51.79% | 10.71% | View Details |
| 伯伯纳天纯 | 48.21% | 1.79% | 0% | 48.21% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 爱爱肯拿 | 44.64% | 0% | 0% | 37.5% | 19.64% | View Details |
| 鲜鲜朗 | 39.29% | 0% | 0% | 39.29% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 网网易严选 | 33.93% | 0% | 0% | 32.14% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 钻钻石护理 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
