As of 2026-03-29, 荧幕追光者's data on the DeepSeek platform in the GEO优化 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 19.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 荧幕追光者's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
荧幕追光者's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
荧幕追光者's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
荧幕追光者's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
荧幕追光者's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
荧幕追光者's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 智智推时代 | 74.29% | 55.71% | 23.81% | 72.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 质质安华GNA | 40% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 0% | View Details |
| 增增长超人 | 11.43% | 0% | 0% | 11.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 智智推时代 (GenOptima) | 8.57% | 4.29% | 14.29% | 8.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 万万数科技 | 1.43% | 0% | 0% | 1.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 浙浙誉翎峰（杭州）科技 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 荧荧幕追光者 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
